Discussion about this post

User's avatar
b2thewats's avatar

It was the right move bringing lefluer back! Also gute! This off-season is huge and who they hire at DC will be interesting!

Boothie's avatar

I found the idea of La Fleur's job being on the line dependent on what was going to happen this year to be ridiculous for the following reasons:

1. He successfully was able to seamlessly work with a franchise QB and build a case for a new franchise QB. I don't know that this has ever been done before.

2. He (with the GM) implemented a roster rebuild without years of being in the depths of the NFL. He, with Gutekunst, was able to do this when they virtually also have been drafting from the last 10 positions in each round.

3. Gutekunst has done a remarkable replenishment of the players. Trading Adams and Rodgers. He has NOT hit on all of his draft picks. No GM does.

Gutekunst and La Fleur have done an exceptional job of refreshing the Packers. They may not be the best GM and Head Coach, but I would suspect each of them would be in the list for Top 5.

Firing La Fleur would have been stupid. Generally, the Packers don't do stupid things. He would have had over a dozen teams begging for his services and would have been hired at a much higher rate (the inflation of the going rate for coaches is probably what held up the signing).

The "Fire La Fleur" crowd is loud but they are: 1) Emotional and 2) Don't have the evaluation resources that the professional teams do. All Head Coaches make mistakes. Oftentimes these are much clearer in hindsight.

The Packers will continue to do their due diligence, self-scout and look for opportunities to improve the team. It will be a bit more difficult over the next two years with no first-round draft pick... but that's the hand that Gutekunst thought was worth it.

Time will Tell.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?